Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 23rd Mar 2005 23:18 UTC, submitted by adel
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



"2) Why linux users always say that eye candy effects are useless and for "noob" when they don't have it, and why they are working for an X server that allow those effects."
It's because there is not a single group of people who all think the same called 'Linux users'.
This is a little off topic but...
If you look at ten random computers running Linux, they will be running different distros, with different desktops, and perhaps even on different architectures. The diversity of choice is astonishing.
Some pure console users even refuse to use bash as a console because it's too 'bloated', preferring sh or csh.
Others are using LookingGlass with a full 3d accelerated desktop.
And yet, I see the same comments assuming that there is some consensus and groupthink going on. I find the opposite to be true, and am puzzled as to why people assume all Linux users think the same way.