Linked by Kris Shaffer on Thu 24th Mar 2005 19:07 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



This article offers some really good reasons why a Google OS simply isn't going to happen: http://daltonlp.com/daltonlp.cgi?item_type=0&item_id=424
But, assuming that all of that was incorrect, I still see another flaw in your reasoning: I doubt Google would bother to base their work on Cell hardware. They're commodity x86 systems already work great, what reason would they have to dedicate so many man hours into porting their work to a different hardware architecture?