Linked by Kris Shaffer on Thu 24th Mar 2005 19:07 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



This is just totally unfounded speculation. There is no "Google OS". Google has readily admitted they are a search engine company, with an investment in content. I think that's the truth. They have a heavily modified version of Linux with their own FS, that much is true, but why would they invest millions to compete against Microsoft? How would they really get the consumer recognition they need? Where is the mainstream application support going to come from? Apple is already gaining momentum, Linux has more recognition and BSD is starting to have some serious potential. What would Google offer? The best desktop search capabilities? This whole speculation of Google taking over the world is silly. They have a proven business model, they aren't going to risk it all for some idiotic attempt to compete with Microsoft.