Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 29th Mar 2005 19:32 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



I don't know what all the hubbub is about, and why people have to keep bashing one over the other. I'm a Gentoo nut and haven't tried Arch, but it looks really intriguing. The only reason I haven't tried it is because I'm way happy with Gentoo, and I have enough on my hands learning Linux to try another distro. But I used to use SuSE till I got fed up with RPM. I'm sure Pacman is a great package manager, but since I haven't tried it I'm not gonna stick my neck out and say that Portage is better than Pacman. I think it's safe to say enough of us have had enough bad experiences with RPM to want to try something else. I'm at the point where I prefer meta distros anyway.
I have almost no trouble with Portage, except when I get brave and try to emerge a masked package. I'm sure all those other package managers have their merits, too.