Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 29th Mar 2005 19:32 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Nice interview.
I used Arch for a while and was quite pleased with it. I couldn't stand the naming of devices so I was quick to switch to udev. I read this interview with my own reasons for finding Arch usefull, but it's amazing how the dev's intentions are translated into their work. In other words, the distro does a good job of representing it's devs. You don't really get that feeling with many other distros.
It would be something to see a distro such as Arch to be able to have the financial and developer abilities in order to complete the goals of it's developers at the pace of a commercialized distro.