Linked by Christian Schaller on Tue 19th Apr 2005 18:26 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



It's not just software patents that block advancement its – all patents. If the Wright Brothers patents been truly enforced it would have taken more than 30 years to get beyond the Wright Flier and get to the single stick type of control. The inventors of common flying systems (flaps, ailerons, joy stick) used today in all aircraft – first got into the air by “stealing” the Wright Brothers basic wing design and wing warping methods. Fact is the Wright Brothers did not innovate after the basic Wright Flier became operational, that fell to others and they started almost the instant that the Wright Brothers got air born.
Patents were first brought into existence as we know them in the US Constitution in 1789. Before this time Kings would sometimes grant special monopolies to the inventor of some item. This was a time that innovation went at a much slower pace than today. Then giving someone a lock on an idea for a few years did not cause much havoc in the market or delayed other new ideas much as the new ideas were coming at a much slower pace even before the new patents were enforced.
Expanding patents can only lead to more havoc and a slow down of the rates of invention.