Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 14th Sep 2002 22:44 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Yes, apt is a WONDERFUL tool, `apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade' is the easiest way of making a system updated in any OS.
In stable and frozen systems, apt works as advertised - and even better. But the reality is only servers and dead people use stable, and testing/frozen seems going the same way, so people are using unstable. And, in unstable, it relies havily on the quality of packages - I wonder I find someone tracking Debian unstable for some time that one day saw his system unusable because of a badly done package/set of packages.
apt is great, but it doesn't substitute the human factor. As any updating system for any OS won't substitute, even if Apple and Microsoft and Eugenia thinks that it could.