Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 14th Sep 2002 22:44 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



> No matter if it is not truly SuSE's
> or Red Hat's or Mandrake's fault
> or not. The problem here is deeper
> and more... philosophical but I won't
> get into it this time.
Have you actually tried RedHat's new package manager? If RH's new package manager isn't dumb-easy to use, I don't know what is.
Actually, Joe user is not a cutting-edge software kind of guy. Typically, he isn't into updating software, so the so-called dependency hell is geek-talk more or less.
I have never used SUSE, but all the dists I use are making amazing progress. LSB is progress. UnitedLinux is progress. Things are not perfect, but they get better all the time, and at an amazing speed. Hey, windows came out many moons ago, but it only became stable and mature recently.
I think the Linux companies are really making progress. Let's cheer them on guys, lets show some appreciation for their hard work. Criticism and writing RFCs is actually the easy part. Writing code and doing work that actually helps make linux better is the hard part.
BEOS was a commercial company. No dependency hell. Single-source control. Excellent UI, according to Be zealots. It still failed anyway.