Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Thu 2nd Jun 2005 00:17 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
- Should Smoking Void Warranties?
posted 2009-11-27 - Apple Asks for Permanent Injunction, Psystar Sold 768 Machines
posted 2009-11-26 - FreeBSD 8.0 Released
posted 2009-11-26 - Repositioning the KDE Brand
posted 2009-11-26 - Ubuntu Dumps the GIMP, Really Needs a Paint.NET
posted 2009-11-25 - Genode 9.11 Gets Webkit, USB Storage, lwIP, ARM Support
posted 2009-11-25 - New Screenshots of Firefox for AmigaOS 4
posted 2009-11-25 - Microsoft on Silverlight vs. Standards
posted 2009-11-24 - Chrome OS Security Overview
posted 2009-11-24 - Opera 10.10 Released, Includes Unite
posted 2009-11-24 - IBM Shows off Power7 HPC Monster
posted 2009-11-27 - Dell Releases Experimental, Unsupported Chrome OS Image
posted 2009-11-27 - Distrowatch: First look at Fedora 12
posted 2009-11-26 - Direct2D Acceleration: Firefox Measures up to IE9
posted 2009-11-26 - Chrome Extensions Site Now Open for Uploads
posted 2009-11-24 - Explore Refactoring Functions in Eclipse JDT
posted 2009-11-24 - KOffice 2.1 Released
posted 2009-11-24 - GNOME Journal November Issue
posted 2009-11-24 - Total security in a PostgreSQL database
posted 2009-11-24 - Microsoft Delays Open Source Release Windows 7 Tool
posted 2009-11-24
Recent Original Stories
- Review: iPhone 3GS 16GB, White posted 2009-11-22
- Review: Acer Aspire One AO751h posted 2009-11-22
- Interview: CEO of Kiloo, Maker of App Store C64 Emulator posted 2009-11-19
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
- RE: Why I use Ubuntu posted 2005-12-07 20:24:38 by Wildcat0695
- RE[2]: mmm posted 2006-03-07 06:28:54 by CaptainPinko
- That sound you just heard... posted 2008-03-26 23:25:52 by AdamW
- Won't the pig die? posted 2008-06-27 15:25:01 by John.Gustafsson
- RE: So far I am not impressed posted 2009-01-28 12:23:41 by puelocesar
Random Stories
- Why Linux Binaries are not as Easy to Handle? posted 2002-12-16
- Resurrecting Older Laptops with Alternative Operating Systems posted 2007-04-04
- Interview with Adam Fedor of the GNUstep Project posted 2001-09-11
Random OS Link





Firstly - i'm very surprised that Gnome is in the lead. I think that the poll has been marked as being tampered with is a good explanation for that phenonomen. From talking to people, the vast majority seem to run KDE (i'd estimate 60% of Linux users that I know). Polls that i've seen conducted elsewhere over time seem to correlate with this figure that i've reached.
Gnome is what I consider very 'dumbed' down. I don't like being told that I can't (easily) configure something. For those bitching about KDE and it's configurability - you *don't* have to reconfigure it just because you have the option. So, what's the problem?
For those bitching about UI - I haven't used Gnome since v1.4 and it went downhill from there imho. KDE has just improved and improved and improved.
Windows/icons? KDE childish? Not in my eyes. It looks clean, crisp and professional.
QT vs GTK? GTK is just plain ugly. Plain ugly. Let me repeat it again for the dumb - plain ugly.
Speed? Gnome does indeed start up faster, and KDE have responded to this by improvements - compare KDE 3.1.4 to 3.4 and you'll see what I mean. With the release of KDE 4 we should see an even larger speed increase. I don't think it'll match Gnome for speed even then though, but I think QT does more, and doing more simply takes more time.
Some choose Gnome because QT by Trolltech isn't considered to be 'free' - fair enough.
I also like XFCE 4.* - very nice. Afterstep rocks as well. So please don't call me a KDE fanboy ;-)
Dave