Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 31st May 2005 23:18 UTC, submitted by Robert Szeleney
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



"I had heard of SkyOS before, but never really paid attention to it. I decided to give the website a look around. Needless to say, I was more than a tad bit disappointed to find it to be a closed source project, especially after apparently being an open source project prior to 5.0. "
Actually it was FREE before 5.0. It hasn't been Open since before version 3, and that was actually a completely different OS anyway, just basically the same name.
And I don't get what's wrong with Closed Source! Open source has way more problems than closed. If it's closed, everything works with the OS. If it's open, a "Linux" application designed for redhat might not work on SuSe.
I commend SkyOS for choosing to keep the source closed.