Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 16th Sep 2002 06:48 UTC, submitted by Cesar Cardoso
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Linux_baby is not stupid and I agree with his comments.
It is common for an OS to be defined by it GUI.
Redhat is not called KDE it is called Redhat.
When you looked at computer monitor, Redhat doesn't want you two think it is just another linux running KDE or Gnome, they want you to think it is a computer running Redhat Linux.
Once I was speaking with a unix admin at school in his office, I saw KDE running and I said "..so you are running linux" he said "no it is freebsd".
Anyway at the end of the day I am more comfortable with Fluxbox and my customized menu.