Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 16th Sep 2002 06:48 UTC, submitted by Cesar Cardoso
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Besides, I forgot to mention. Red Hat is doing a much better job in getting to the desktop that any of the KDE supporting distros out there. Does Lindows, Xandros, Lycoris and ELX offers anything compelling against Red Hat for the corporate desktop?
Trust me, give it a few years, Red Hat would be the dominant desktop player. If they aren't, it would be some other company going the same direction as they are, only doing what they do better.
So, my conclusion is that it doesn't matter whether Red Hat uses GNOME or KDE. Red Hat wouldn't gain a significant amount of users if they choosed KDE, they wouldn't also otherwise.
Besides, it is interesting to note that the three Windows clones (Lindows, ELX and Lycoris), choose KDE because it is more Windows-like than GNOME, giving them less work....