Linked by Andy Roberts on Thu 9th Jun 2005 20:58 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Obviously so that they can provide interoperability and leverage mindshare. Implementing popular tools to reap the benefits of popularity. Reusing existing work instead of reimplementing the wheel.
It's not as if because Mono or free Java implementations exist, that everything else that isn't Mono or Java doesn't. There are more projects that aren't Mono or Harmony, so what exactly is your point?
All of this "innovation" nonsense that is constantly repeated is kind of stupid. Most things aren't innovative. Being innovative isn't some mystical inherit asset that makes what you're doing valuable. I'm creating a never before seen pile of no one gives a crap! Come one and come all!