Sun Microsystems is expected to release Solaris as open-source software Tuesday, a centerpiece of the company's plan to regain lost relevance and fend of rivals Red Hat, IBM and Microsoft.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
With the GPL, I can use the code any way I want, as long as I opensource whatever I create with the code. With Solaris, I can't do that.
Unlike GPL code, Solaris is a one-way street: I can donate code to Sun; but Sun doesn't allow me to use their code in my projects.
Considering this vast difference in licensing, I can't see developers ethusiastically supporting Open Solaris, the way the F/OSS community supports Linux or FreeBSD.
If I were a developer, what do I get out of supporting Sun? The thrill of helping McNeally or Shwartz make more money?
No bash here. Maybe I just don't understand.
With the GPL, I can use the code any way I want, as long as I opensource whatever I create with the code. With Solaris, I can't do that.
Unlike GPL code, Solaris is a one-way street: I can donate code to Sun; but Sun doesn't allow me to use their code in my projects.
Considering this vast difference in licensing, I can't see developers ethusiastically supporting Open Solaris, the way the F/OSS community supports Linux or FreeBSD.
If I were a developer, what do I get out of supporting Sun? The thrill of helping McNeally or Shwartz make more money?
Maybe I'm completely wrong in my outlook.