Linked by Eugenia Loli on Thu 23rd Jun 2005 18:11 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Scott, you're a little behind on the ports count, it currently stands at 13135. (For what it's worth, all but a few of these are source-based.)
As per the initial question: although people occasionally ask about branching the ports tree, in practice we don't feel we have enough manpower to do it The effort of keeping the ports tree up-to-date on the various combinations of major releases and architectures is as much as we care to handle, even with the automated ports building cluster (IMHO FreeBSD's "secret weapon").
So for the moment there is no plan to do anything to the ports trees for releases, other than CVS tags, which we already do.