Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 2nd Oct 2002 17:49 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Perhaps those complaining about irix security holes
would do better to use a more up to date version of
irix and/or a more competent admin. A version that
wasn't retired 5 or 6 years ago for example, as
the 5.3 version that someone complained about was. Sure,
older versions did have security issues...show me an
older version of any os that doesn't. And yes, the new
6.5.x (x increments by 1 every 3 months for free) os
costs money and it ain't cheap. It is also stable and as
secure as any unix out thereas long as the admin is
competent.