Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 28th Aug 2001 19:20 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



I've been using XFS at home on my RedHat 7.1 systems since version 1.0. Apart from a minor error with GCC 2.96 (or whatever weird GCC RedHat ship with) - having to force a kernel recompile of 2.4.5 to use kgcc - it's been running quite merrily. I've not noticed any lack of performance although deleting huge amounts of files can be a little tedious; this might sound weird for a home machine but I like to tinker with mozilla and kernels so it's quite common for me to have masses of files suddenly deleted after I've decided that I've finished with the sources. What I have noticed is that my XFS systems run as quickly as my EXT2 systems on the same machine. Furthermore, on a machine where I had XFS and reiserfs (XFS V1.0/RedHat SGI Compiled Kernel and RedHat 7.1's RedHat Compiled Kernel + reiserfs), I couldn't honestly tell the difference. DSL