Linked by Robert C. Dowdy on Tue 8th Oct 2002 02:36 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Err, sorry to be pendantic, but 32-bit color is absolutely not different from 24-bit color. In theory, 32-bit color in X uses 8 bits per pixel with 8 bits of padding, because memory accesses that are not aligned on 4 byte boundries are really slow. X definately does not support alpha transparency on the primary surface yet. Now, this is a moot point, because in the X configurator, 24-bit color actually means the 32-bit 8-8-8-padded format. So choosing 24-bit color has no drawbacks, neither in visual quality nor performance.