Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sun 20th Oct 2002 17:14 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



But this is not what I asked.

Firstly, I stated a fact: Times changing, and no matter how generic and bare-bones Debian might be in order to be customized by its distributors, it HAS to add new features and advancements in its own technical aspects. Either that, or Debian is not progressing. EVERYTHING has to progress in the software business. And I am *not* talking about the desktop. I am talking about the bare bones features too.
Then, I asked the question: "what are the new advancements Debian has received the last 2-3 years, in ANY department, that makes it still a good option for its distributors to choose Debian instead of another distro".
This question has not been answered. What you replied is just that Debian is not Mandrake, so it is not comparable. Ditto. But what I ask, is different.
If you reply "no new advancements, but the others haven't caught up yet", that to me look like stegnation. And stegnation and lack of innovation means death, to *any* software piece. New innovations HAS to be part of any new version.
So, what are these *new* advancements, that will make ME to decide to use Debian as my "Eugenia Linux" distribution? (hypothetically speaking