Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sun 20th Oct 2002 17:14 UTC
Debian and its clones "This is a critical review of Debian 3.0, but I want to say right from the start that I'm not trying to bait anyone. However I feel that reviewers often root for Debian as the open-source underdog, and give it marks which it doesn't deserve. If RedHat 8.0 came out with installation software like Debian 3.0 it would be savaged. I think it's time for an honest review, to spur the Debian developers into making the best possible distribution. I really want Debian to succeed. I want to use it daily, and recommend it to my friends. But I can't do that right now and I think it's important people understand why." Read the review and its (already long) discussion at DebianPlanet.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
restated another way
by Darren on Sun 20th Oct 2002 19:02 UTC

Since some people still seem to be missing the point, let me try to restate what's already been stated in another way.

Consider Debian to be a kernel and a world class package management system wrapped up in one, to either be used:
1. by itself as a server
2. with other developer's installation and configuration tools (libranet, xandros)

Complaining that Deb doesn't have a gui installer is almost like complaining that the Linux kernel doesn't have an installer. It's not that it couldn't have it. It's that it's not supposed to have it.

Darren