Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sun 20th Oct 2002 17:14 UTC
Debian and its clones "This is a critical review of Debian 3.0, but I want to say right from the start that I'm not trying to bait anyone. However I feel that reviewers often root for Debian as the open-source underdog, and give it marks which it doesn't deserve. If RedHat 8.0 came out with installation software like Debian 3.0 it would be savaged. I think it's time for an honest review, to spur the Debian developers into making the best possible distribution. I really want Debian to succeed. I want to use it daily, and recommend it to my friends. But I can't do that right now and I think it's important people understand why." Read the review and its (already long) discussion at DebianPlanet.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Re: Re: Still hazy
by Richard Fillion on Sun 20th Oct 2002 20:19 UTC

(debian-specific)

Why should anything be debian specific? I thought the goal of the open source community was to be able to share code, so that everyone advances together. So if someone makes a tool that configures say samba for you, and opensource it. You could apt-get it, but hey, this isnt exclusive to debian so it doesnt count?

Does "joe user" care if their kernel has a special redhat patch? They dont even know what a kernel is. And as for debian still using 2.2, who cares? You could always use a 2.4 kernel with it. And with woody now they provide you with one, though not by default, for stability reasons (2.2 IS more stable than 2.4). I suggest every build themselves a custom kernel afterwards anyways.