Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sun 20th Oct 2002 17:14 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Reinstalling SuSE/RedHat/Mandrake every time they release a new version is not my idea of user friendliness. Those systems are practically impossible to update without breakage (Demanding guru knowledge to sort out). You can run a Debian desktop, continiously updated with recent software, _for years_ witout reinstalling, that is why Debian is more user friendly than the others.
Why whould a small detail like the installer be so important if you compare it to the above? If you actually use the system and not just testing/giwing a whirl/ playing, which feature would you consider most important for user friendliness?
The installer seems very important for users of the other distros becouse they spend so much time in them! :-)