Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sun 20th Oct 2002 17:14 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Another note on the installer.
I believed someone mentioend something along these lines. I just thought Id repeat it in my own words. Debian gives you control. It starst with what works for people and you can do and not do what will work for you. How many graphical isntaller based distributions still offer a text based install and how good is it? how easy i it to get to?
I can udnerstand why they dont hasve a graphical install yet, not an good architecure to still support text based installs. Thats what the new installer fixes. They created udebs (Micro packages) to handle packaging and dependencies for plugins for the installer. Just now I read a status update that mentioned a GTK front end.
I dont have personal experience with it but how stable si hardware detection? What happens with unsupported/broken hardware. When debian supports it, I bet tehyll give you a chcie to detect. I rememebr seeing a Red Hat and Mandrake isntall and dont rememebr a choice about hardware detection.