Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sun 20th Oct 2002 17:14 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



I don't understand the Debian zealotry _at all_. I have used a couple of Debian systems and, apart from the niceness of apt, been largely unimpressed. Redhat do as good a job at pushing out security upgrades in a timely manner and have the massive advantage of not having to run an "unstable" version to get half-recent software.
Debian's release cycle just doesn't match those of the software from which it is built. The unfortunate truth is that Debian is obselete as soon as it is declared "stable".