Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sun 20th Oct 2002 17:14 UTC
Debian and its clones "This is a critical review of Debian 3.0, but I want to say right from the start that I'm not trying to bait anyone. However I feel that reviewers often root for Debian as the open-source underdog, and give it marks which it doesn't deserve. If RedHat 8.0 came out with installation software like Debian 3.0 it would be savaged. I think it's time for an honest review, to spur the Debian developers into making the best possible distribution. I really want Debian to succeed. I want to use it daily, and recommend it to my friends. But I can't do that right now and I think it's important people understand why." Read the review and its (already long) discussion at DebianPlanet.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
by Richard Fillion on Mon 21st Oct 2002 03:54 UTC

Redhat do as good a job at pushing out security upgrades in a timely manner and have the massive advantage of not having to run an "unstable" version to get half-recent software.

Yes but when they patch a security whole, can the system fix it all up for you? I have a "security" line in my sources.list file for apt, and i just did apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade, because of of security matters, it updated 3 packages.

RedHat has apt now, but is it really as good at Debian's? I'm asking this seriously here. Does it have all the repositories taht debian has?