Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sun 20th Oct 2002 17:14 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



I'm not sure why some people seem bent on making us feel guilty for doing stuff our way.
Debian is like a politician that doesn't take contributions to fund his campaigns. It doesn't need to answer to anyone. The guys running the show do what they want. And they will tend to scratch their own itches, which also happened to be shared by a substantial group of people.
If you don't like that installer, that is your itch. Scratch it yourself. If you don't want to, or can't, then relish in the availability of options and use one of the other distributions that have your interests in mind.
But don't expect to get anywhere by complaining here. I'm sure that all of the "improvements" mentioned here have crossed the minds of the multitude of people working on Debian. Whatever they've chosen to do about them, this discussion isn't going to change their mind.
And there is nothing elitist about that. Its rather ungrateful to tell volunteers what they should be doing, or to tell them they are irrelevant because you don't like their work. The review itself seemed fine (can't pull up debianplanet to look over it again), but some of the posts here have started crossing the line.