Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 19th Nov 2002 09:24 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



That I doubt. Sure Solaris 9 was a big improvement over 8, but the difference isn't all that big. Solaris isn't moving that fast. I'm not talking about the main kernel repository. There are plenty of things that are being done outside kernel.org that gives Linux a bigger competitive egde.
The problem is, we all know that Linux is just the kernel. And I was really talking about the kernel. Userland, that can work on most any Unix platform. In other words, all Unices are on the same level, more or less. In fact, as you know, StarOffice, Mozilla, GIMP, XMMS and Freeciv (assorted list of applications) run on Solaris just as they do on Linux.
If you want to discuss the management tools, yes, Linux has progressed and it finally has, for example, logical volume management, although rather primitive. Contrast that to the fact that Solaris has available two excellent systems (Solaris Volume Manager, was Solstice, and Veritas VM). But if I may, for once, make a prediction, I guess Veritas will be proted to Linux sooner or later. Did I make your day? But there are other system management tools that are missing from Linux.
If we talk about Linux the kernel, it still has a lot to catch up with the goodies from Solaris.