Linked by Mike Hearn on Fri 6th Dec 2002 08:37 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



I think decentralised package mangeement using a p2p network style is a very good Idea.
Another One is to make aLL linux station that are willing to to become a node.
Another One is to be able to be able to produce every package you've installed from your installed station (useful for being a node)
(gpg signature is needed for distribution)
A Gui for producing package is essential.
An import Tool (from deb, rpm to autopackage)
An integrated bug report tool for each package that send the report to the good person (improving bug reports improve softwares)
Data to be installed must be downloaded separatly from the package scripts.
You download script, it checks what it needs, then download it.
(not like urpmi that get a huge list, then use it for requesting sofware needed. the package should be able to resolve thos)
A Security graduation notation for Package (installing a new kernel is more dangerous than a new text editor...)
Very good initiative !!