"The Open Source community's answer is to ignore Microsoft's incredible technological lead - because it is proprietary and not a standard - and instead focusses on their own cool thing and self-gratifying cool features, because they think they can do better (which is where the ignorance combined with ego comes in)."Join the discussion at Advogato.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
[i]That's said, my dear Nico, of course i'm a professionnal troll. How did you guess it ?
Because i miss the magic sentence : Linux ? It's rock ! [i]
Mon cher Xavier,
I didn't even mention linux. But what you wrote is clearly stupid. Some free softwares with 0$ cost are crap, as many of commercial softwares. But there ARE also many free softwares of great quality, which beats commercial software hands down (for example, JBoss, Apache). Cost of software isn't a good measure of software quality...
And as said earlier, with such a crap statement, you are in fact far from beeing a "professionnal" troller. Too lame. A good troller would be far more subtile.
[i]That's said, my dear Nico, of course i'm a professionnal troll. How did you guess it ?
Because i miss the magic sentence : Linux ? It's rock ! [i]
Mon cher Xavier,
I didn't even mention linux. But what you wrote is clearly stupid. Some free softwares with 0$ cost are crap, as many of commercial softwares. But there ARE also many free softwares of great quality, which beats commercial software hands down (for example, JBoss, Apache). Cost of software isn't a good measure of software quality...
And as said earlier, with such a crap statement, you are in fact far from beeing a "professionnal" troller. Too lame. A good troller would be far more subtile.