"The Open Source community's answer is to ignore Microsoft's incredible technological lead - because it is proprietary and not a standard - and instead focusses on their own cool thing and self-gratifying cool features, because they think they can do better (which is where the ignorance combined with ego comes in)."Join the discussion at Advogato.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
One more time, the quality of Apache is to be free, free as beer. Apache cruelly lacks any threading capabilities, just because it is another "Linux minded" software, and Linux have very poor threading feature. But "hacker" promised that in the 2.6 or later kernel, this 20 years old feature of other system will be really implemented in Linux. That's apart, Linux ? It's rock ! The only system warping you in the past, and for 0$. I think we need to create another category of system. Operating system is not rich enough to describe Linux, NS for Nostalgia System will be perfect ;-)))
But please, Jboss is not free, you have to pay ( little dollars ) for the documentation. Anyway Jboss can't be compared with Apache, just because Apache is running...
One more time, the quality of Apache is to be free, free as beer. Apache cruelly lacks any threading capabilities, just because it is another "Linux minded" software, and Linux have very poor threading feature. But "hacker" promised that in the 2.6 or later kernel, this 20 years old feature of other system will be really implemented in Linux. That's apart, Linux ? It's rock ! The only system warping you in the past, and for 0$. I think we need to create another category of system. Operating system is not rich enough to describe Linux, NS for Nostalgia System will be perfect ;-)))
But please, Jboss is not free, you have to pay ( little dollars ) for the documentation. Anyway Jboss can't be compared with Apache, just because Apache is running...