"The Open Source community's answer is to ignore Microsoft's incredible technological lead - because it is proprietary and not a standard - and instead focusses on their own cool thing and self-gratifying cool features, because they think they can do better (which is where the ignorance combined with ego comes in)."Join the discussion at Advogato.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
> 1. NT was jointly developed by MS and IBM, marketed by
> MS as NT/W2K/XP, and by IBM as OS/2 and OS/2 Warp.
Actually, the products that were sold as "OS/2" bear very little resemblence to those sold as "Windows NT" and its subsequent flavors.
The two share some history and some minor bits of code, but the two diverged *significantly* well before the first IBM release of OS/2 (v2.0) in 1992...
> 1. NT was jointly developed by MS and IBM, marketed by
> MS as NT/W2K/XP, and by IBM as OS/2 and OS/2 Warp.
Actually, the products that were sold as "OS/2" bear very little resemblence to those sold as "Windows NT" and its subsequent flavors.
The two share some history and some minor bits of code, but the two diverged *significantly* well before the first IBM release of OS/2 (v2.0) in 1992...