"The Open Source community's answer is to ignore Microsoft's incredible technological lead - because it is proprietary and not a standard - and instead focusses on their own cool thing and self-gratifying cool features, because they think they can do better (which is where the ignorance combined with ego comes in)."Join the discussion at Advogato.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
> Open source has not produced anything innovative. All it
> has done is clone existing software and ideas.
How many commercial single-floppy firewall products can you name?
One could argue that the DEVELOPMENT PROCESS that some open source software uses is innovative -- read the paper _The Cathedral and the Bazaar_ for more information.
> I mean really... Outside of a few common applications
> like mail software and web servers, is there any open
> souce software that is anything more than a poorly done
> and semi-functional clone of a commercial product?
> Open source has not produced anything innovative. All it
> has done is clone existing software and ideas.
How many commercial single-floppy firewall products can you name?
One could argue that the DEVELOPMENT PROCESS that some open source software uses is innovative -- read the paper _The Cathedral and the Bazaar_ for more information.
> I mean really... Outside of a few common applications
> like mail software and web servers, is there any open
> souce software that is anything more than a poorly done
> and semi-functional clone of a commercial product?
Mozilla? VNC? Samba? EMACS? Perl?
How about FreeBSD?