Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Thu 16th Aug 2001 17:54 UTC, submitted by Irfon-Kim Ahmad
Our take: Well, at least something happened. I think it is safe to assume that Be will be now closed down (the closing down of the company is pretty much certain, according to the press release "Be's board of directors has approved the transaction, and the winding-up of Be's operating business following the closing") as they now own nothing (except if they want to enter another markets or.. become car or pencil dealers). Being myself a BeOS advocate, user and developer for several years now, I am sad to see this twist and what it probably means for the BeOS. While Palm has not stated what they want to do with Be's technology, my guess is that they do not care about the BeOS and the Desktop OS world. Slashdot has it right this time: I believe Palm mostly bought the engineering force, to create something new and continue make their living in the PDA market. Palm is entering the Desktop through BeOS you say? Yeah, right. I will believe it when I see it. In my mind, the only way to see a BeOS R6 is if there will be a third party licensee that is interesting to license BeOS and do something productive with it (assuming that Palm will be willing to allow that). Palm does not have what it takes to drive a desktop OS neither BeOS can be open sourced (too much licensed source code all over the place).
Update: Not a crucial update to the story, just trying to add a bit of spicy humour. We just had an anonymous sending us in this picture, while BeDoper has its regular, humouristic take on the latest happenings in the Be world.
Update2: ZDNews writes: "However, Palm said it has no plans to further develop the Be operating system as a standalone OS."
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




FREE SOFTWARE Jep, sorry for this. I know that's not what you want to hear.
I just hope that you learn from it. When I first saw BeOS, I was very impressed by it and thought "that's how I want my OS to be", but I knew that I wouldn't set may hopes into it. I honestly don't believe, that a closed source OS can compete with MS and Apple this days. They are just way too strong!
Look at Linux. You say it was no success? WTF? Do you know of any other OS that grew so quickly? Do you know any OS that could catch up with Mac OS and be the main competitor for Windows in Intel plattforms? I don't.
And don't forget, that Linux is in no way a desktop OS. I would even say, compared to BeOS, Linux is just crap on the private desktop (while beeing great for servers, companys and network hackers).
Just imagine what Linux could be today, if it would have the capabilities of BeOS!
Almost everybody knows Linux today, the reason it didn't really catch up to Windows is mostly, that Linux is just not the best thing since sliced bread... most Linux users are coders (like me), very experienced computer users, anti-Microsoft zealots and those who just like to be "different" cause they think it makes them leet somehow.
That's not very good.
A free desktop system like BeOS could give Microsoft a run for it's money. That's why I set my hope in the future off AtheOS.
It will take some years to reach the polish of a system like BeOS and the software diversity of a system like Linux, but I'm sure it will happen. Free software never dies.