Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 3rd Feb 2003 23:25 UTC, submitted by Jonathan
FreeBSD One of the most prolific and active developers of FreeBSD, Matt Dillon, responsible for a lot of the latest advances in the FreeBSD kernel, lost his right to commit code to the source tree. The FreeBSD Project didn't give a solid reason on what lead them to this decision. Last year, OSNews interviewed Matt about his (truly immense) work on FreeBSD.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.

Hm...

tpv on Linus: He's never been in that situation.

Benevolents dictators has its advantages ;)

Charles:
Whether free or paid, people who use a product are customers, who in turn are stakeholders, who in turn have a vested interest in the quality and direction of the product. In the absense of any formal and verifiable discipline proceedure, all stakeholders gain the natural right of inquiry.


Excellent point! The Core team has to give some excuses. Even an empty one is better than no-one.

---

And what's the bad of forking? People seem to fear fork as a waste of energy/time. I wonder if OpenBSD, NeXTStep and Darwin are waste of energy/time, not talking about the most famous fork of all time - MS-DOS - because it's not Open Source ;)