Linked by Nathan Mace on Thu 31st Jan 2002 18:45 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



He didn't mention that FreeBSD ports don't know how to deal with hand installed software (just like rpm and deb/apt-get) that has been installed without using a port. The ports system is very nice, but its not much different than using a linux distribution with a real packaging system (Debian and Gentoo come to mind) rather than something rpm based. If a port/package isn't available for something when you install it and becomes available later, you're in the same boat. i highly recommend using GNU stow to manage such installations.
He also seems to think that what comes in the "default" install matters. Nobody serious about their computer will use a default, especially for a server; the minimal option and adding needed software later is best there. FreeBSD only has one distribution and one default; linux has zillions with zillions of defaults.
FreeBSD is a great OS, but take off those rose colored glasses. Claiming that "they prefer tried and tested code over flashy new features" is wrong. They simply do not have nearly as many interested hackers working on random device drivers and new flashy features as linux does. If you want to run FreeBSD, be sure to treat it like any other niche OS: choose your hardware specifically for the OS. Do that and you'll have a great time! (Mmmm.. soft updates!)