Linked by Nathan Mace on Thu 31st Jan 2002 18:45 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



I really can't believe that everyone is forgetting to mention how rock-stable yahoo is. Hell it ran hotmail forever and a day before MS came along and forced hotmail to run on windows (side note: anyone else know they had to throw three times as many computers at it because of that?), yahoo uses it, heck ... go to http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html" http://uptime.... anyone else notice that FreeBSD is holding it's own with the commercial big boys? Ahh yes ... also make note that Linux sorta missed the boat there ...
<P>
Here's where I will get the most flack I know. I like um both ... FreeBSD is stable and Linux is fun ... they've both taught me so much. FreeBSD, Slackware, and Debian are all my choices for a server OS for one reason. They all follow the same model, Get the computer up and running minimally after install. Then make it easy to grab everything the user will need. And boom, you have have security because you know exactly what's been installed. You have stability because we all know that you set debian to STABLE for a server ... right?
<P>
Hey ... no matter what ... they're all command line to me :-)
<P>
SuperDuG