Linked by Clinton De Young on Mon 3rd Mar 2003 03:07 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 19:39 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Hooray for passing judgement on someone who you don't know! The world needs much more of that!
People like Strike and the rest of them, although they deny being what they are, are mostly advanced users who relish humilliating newbies and directing them to RTFM, which IMO, and for the most part, is badly written and lack clear and precise instructions for newcomers; to them, we are drooling morons, I guess "priests seldom remember when they were altar boys".
Gee, is that why I more or less single-handedly supported a community forum for over 10,000 NEWBIE Linux users for the span of several years?
Besides, none of you are addressing the main point at all. The point is that generic kernel compile tutorials exist all over the place. If you are going to make one specifically tailored for a distribution, you should use all the resources that were designed specifically for building kernels in that distribution. In this case, that includes things like the kernel source packages, and this tutorial (which isn't a bad one by any means) leaves those out where it would be better served including them.