Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 17th Mar 2003 22:49 UTC
Graphics, User Interfaces So many operating systems and so many graphical desktop environments... This article is a comparison of the UI and usability of several Desktop Environments (DEs), that have been widely used, admired and reviled: Windows XP Luna, BeOS 6 (Dano/Zeta), Mac OS X Aqua and Unix's KDE and Gnome. Read on which one got our best score on our long term test and usage.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You forgot a couple things...
by Robert Warwick on Tue 18th Mar 2003 03:15 UTC

Though you did try to look at all the characteristics, there are a few things I think you missed. I'm gonna mention KDE a lot because that's what I use.

- ALT-F2 in KDE. It's a run command dialog. I find this an easy and convienent way to open up any program and rarely use the K menu (start menu equivelent).

- Linux is (at current) still for reasonably technical people. If your biggest concern is 'it's pretty' then you probably shouldn't use it. Different DE's are really good for different people. I use a Mac at work, Windows at school, and KDE at home.

- It's easy enough to change your theme in KDE. I think it's just as easy as in Windows. Of course, you have to use KDE a bit before it becomes easy, but ditto with Mac, Windows...

- What about changing the default app for opening up a document? I think it's so incredibly easy in KDE, while I've seen friends spend far too much time trying to figure it out on Windows. Of course, that was 98. I haven't seen anyone do this on XP.

- Multiple desktops. I can barely get along without these at work. I take them for granted with KDE, being able to keep my work seperated and visible.

Thanks for all the work you put into the article, but I'd be more able to believe a review compiled by several people. Or at least read over by one person who uses each DE _heavily_.