Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 17th Mar 2003 22:49 UTC
Graphics, User Interfaces So many operating systems and so many graphical desktop environments... This article is a comparison of the UI and usability of several Desktop Environments (DEs), that have been widely used, admired and reviled: Windows XP Luna, BeOS 6 (Dano/Zeta), Mac OS X Aqua and Unix's KDE and Gnome. Read on which one got our best score on our long term test and usage.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
My WM Review
by Nico Coetzee on Tue 18th Mar 2003 04:52 UTC

"let me apologize in advance for not including..."

If you used Linux to look at KDE and Gnome, you could have easily looked at many other Dekstops. I use WindowMaker every day, and here is my 2c's:

The Look and Feel
"Clean" comes to mind when using WM.There is really a minimum of clutter on the Desktop, and what I like most is that there is no "task bar". The menu is anywhere on the desktop - just right click. For me it's the small things like this that really makes WM perfect.

My Rating: 9

Usability

The less "gadgets" there are the more usable the Desktop should be. What do you really need? A menu system, a configuration agent, Date and Time, Desktop Switcher and a place to get you minimized apps from.

WM does for me what I expect - 100% of the time. BTW, my current Desktop session is up for 48 days and a little over 23 hours.

Rating: 10

Consistency

Come on - seriously now! The only thing then let WM loose a point here is that they changed the theme formats at one stage - which led to incompatibility between themes and versions of WM. Today that is a non issue.

Rating: 9

Integration

This is also the weakest point in stability in Windows XP. You can't manage a PC with BSOD - even though an underlying app caused a problem.

Granted - most of the stuff in Unix ( in general ) is done in a terminal. Then again, if you use Mandrake Linux you can configure your system without going to the terminal to often.

My Rating: 7

Flexibility

For me this is a non-issue. Maybe it's because I'm not into fancy stuff and eye candy.

In terms of configuration options to customize WM, I think all the other reviewed desktops take a distant 2nd anyway.

My rating: 9

Speed

Come on....

Rating: 10

Stability and Bugs

No bugs visible in the UI. As I mentioned - my session uptime is close to 49 days now. Scary if you take into account WM is still Beta ;)

Rating: 10

Technology + Programming Framework

Windows and Mac are really out of their depth here. Especially since they are Closed Sources.

Rating: 9

My Conclusion

Interesting article, but very Windows bias. I hope you will have more objective reviews in the future.

Cheers