Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 17th Mar 2003 22:49 UTC
Graphics, User Interfaces So many operating systems and so many graphical desktop environments... This article is a comparison of the UI and usability of several Desktop Environments (DEs), that have been widely used, admired and reviled: Windows XP Luna, BeOS 6 (Dano/Zeta), Mac OS X Aqua and Unix's KDE and Gnome. Read on which one got our best score on our long term test and usage.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Puh-lease
by Peter Colijn on Wed 19th Mar 2003 05:02 UTC

WinXP more stable than OS X? Gimme a break. I've *never* had a WinXP box last more than a week without locking up, crashing, etc. I agree, 2k/XP are *light years* ahead of 9x, but they "just ain't there" in terms of stability. My Mac can easily do 30 days uptime, no sweat. I usually only reboot it for software updates.

And WinXP more stable that GNOME? WTF? Maybe I don't use WinXP and GNOME the same way you do, but I sure as *hell* don't think WinXP is more stable than GNOME *at all*. Yes I have had some GNOME apps crash on me (Galeon and Totem in particular). But I just fire 'em up again and all is well. In XP sometimes that's possible, sometimes you just get into a never-ending cycle of "End task", "End now", "End task", "End now", and nothing ever happens. And then there's the lovely blue-screens and spontaneous reboots. Once again, light years ahead of 9x, but these things are *not* gone in XP/2k. I routinely have my GNOME desktops running for 60-80 days straight, no sweat. Let me reiterate that yes, sometimes *applications* crash, but nothing so serious as to force me to logout and log back in. When I do logout/login, it's usually because I got a new version of GNOME.