Linked by Eugenia Loli on Thu 3rd Apr 2003 17:16 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



>>>>The money saved here is in memory and ancillery chips.
Not necessarily --- because QNX and VxWorks have even smaller footprints. So if NetBSD can do it with a 486, QNX/Vxworks can do it with a 386. If NetBSD needs 4 Meg of RAM, QNX/Vxworks can do it with 2 Meg of RAM.
And pricing for QNX/VxWorks are all over the place --- most of the disposible ink-jet printers (where the price of ink refill is greater than the printer itself) runs on vxworks ---- per unit royalty for QNX/VxWorks can be less than $1 per ink-jet printer or more than thousands of dollars per MRI machines in hospitals.
So there are always the probably that the cost of per unit royalty for QNX/VxWorks to be less than the cost of increased hardware requirement if NetBSD is used.