I can't take anymore comments like "Debian/Gentoo/OpenBSD/etc. are not good/user-friendly because they lack a graphical installer." Searching the web, I couldn't find a comprehensive site describing the good and the bad about graphical installers for various OSes throughout the years, so in this article I hope to debunk a few of the myths on the basis of my own personal and professional experience.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
No! No! No! The text age should absolutely _NOT_ come to an end, at least not while I'm alive
So you like GUI's. Fine, go ahead and use a GUI-based OS, there's plenty of those around.
But I (and though it may well be a minority, I'm not alone on this) prefer text-based systems. Sure I do use X because some apps need to be graphical (image viewers etc.), and to be able to nicely fit a lot of xterms on my screen. But I do not want kludged and bloated GUI config tools. And I absolutely not want to be locked out on certain areas of the system (like M$ Windows does, and some Linux distro's are starting to go down this alley too...)
Look at it this way: Suppose you prefer wine over beer, should we all stop drinking beer?
No! No! No! The text age should absolutely _NOT_ come to an end, at least not while I'm alive
So you like GUI's. Fine, go ahead and use a GUI-based OS, there's plenty of those around.
But I (and though it may well be a minority, I'm not alone on this) prefer text-based systems. Sure I do use X because some apps need to be graphical (image viewers etc.), and to be able to nicely fit a lot of xterms on my screen. But I do not want kludged and bloated GUI config tools. And I absolutely not want to be locked out on certain areas of the system (like M$ Windows does, and some Linux distro's are starting to go down this alley too...)
Look at it this way: Suppose you prefer wine over beer, should we all stop drinking beer?