I can't take anymore comments like "Debian/Gentoo/OpenBSD/etc. are not good/user-friendly because they lack a graphical installer." Searching the web, I couldn't find a comprehensive site describing the good and the bad about graphical installers for various OSes throughout the years, so in this article I hope to debunk a few of the myths on the basis of my own personal and professional experience.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
One thing overlooked is that in the Windows world, the majority of people never install the OS -- it comes pre-installed on their computer. Most WinUsers view the computer as an appliance to write letters, surf the net, play games, etc. They don't have or want a clue as to how the innards work.
My hope is that the Dells, Compaqs, & Gateways of the world will start offering Linux pre-installed. They did at one time, but it wasn't cost-effective because they had to buy a MS OS license for each box sold whether it had the MS OS installed or not. Maybe they still do, but it's not obvious in a casual perusal of their sites.
One thing overlooked is that in the Windows world, the majority of people never install the OS -- it comes pre-installed on their computer. Most WinUsers view the computer as an appliance to write letters, surf the net, play games, etc. They don't have or want a clue as to how the innards work.
My hope is that the Dells, Compaqs, & Gateways of the world will start offering Linux pre-installed. They did at one time, but it wasn't cost-effective because they had to buy a MS OS license for each box sold whether it had the MS OS installed or not. Maybe they still do, but it's not obvious in a casual perusal of their sites.