Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 15th Apr 2003 17:14 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Looks like the choice of Tcl (over, say Python) is worth questioning. RMS believed it was a limited language and a bad foundation:
http://www.vanderburg.org/Tcl/war/0000.html
Maybe Tcl has caught up and become stronger, or it might be good for this domain. But I wonder if systems coders just make bad choices when building applications. For example, Hubbard's criticism of Python is weird; I've never known anyone to have problems with whitespace. Can anyone maintain code where the indentation isn't aligned?
The rest of what he says is fine; no doubt Tcl has a longer history being embedded in apps, and he says it really was a subjective choice. I just wonder if systems guys have a blindspot.