This is a desktop comparison of Red Hat Linux 9 and SuSE 8.2 Professional Edition. We have used Red Hat Linux 8 for all our work since last fall, and installed version 9 as soon as it became available. However, we have not been fully content with Red Hat, so we gave SuSE 8.2 a try when it became available this month.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"A big minus for SuSE is the lack of a Jabber client. There is no PSI and no Gabber. Actually, Red Hat has neither as well, but at least you can get proper RPMs from the Internet with a minimal effort."
What the hell is that? Neither of them have it. Why would you complain about just one of them?
Ok, Windows, Free/Net/OpenBSD, BeOS, QNX, MacOS9/X, or any other operating system comes with RealPlayer. And most without Adobe. My cry to Redhat.
Not very reasonable...
"A big minus for SuSE is the lack of a Jabber client. There is no PSI and no Gabber. Actually, Red Hat has neither as well, but at least you can get proper RPMs from the Internet with a minimal effort."
What the hell is that? Neither of them have it. Why would you complain about just one of them?
Ok, Windows, Free/Net/OpenBSD, BeOS, QNX, MacOS9/X, or any other operating system comes with RealPlayer. And most without Adobe. My cry to Redhat.