This is a desktop comparison of Red Hat Linux 9 and SuSE 8.2 Professional Edition. We have used Red Hat Linux 8 for all our work since last fall, and installed version 9 as soon as it became available. However, we have not been fully content with Red Hat, so we gave SuSE 8.2 a try when it became available this month.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I have used Mandrake 9.0 and now 9.1. Both recognized all my hardware, including integrated sound card, and installed without any problems whatsoever. Considering that the article states that there were problems during installation with both RH 9 and Suse 8.2, it is an achievement for Mandrake to have a flawless installation process. Now I use 9.1 and am quite satisfied with it. Does anyone know how it compares to RH 9 and Suse 8.2?
I have used Mandrake 9.0 and now 9.1. Both recognized all my hardware, including integrated sound card, and installed without any problems whatsoever. Considering that the article states that there were problems during installation with both RH 9 and Suse 8.2, it is an achievement for Mandrake to have a flawless installation process. Now I use 9.1 and am quite satisfied with it. Does anyone know how it compares to RH 9 and Suse 8.2?