Linked by Aki Kolehmainen on Tue 29th Apr 2003 03:30 UTC
This is a desktop comparison of Red Hat Linux 9 and SuSE 8.2 Professional Edition. We have used Red Hat Linux 8 for all our work since last fall, and installed version 9 as soon as it became available. However, we have not been fully content with Red Hat, so we gave SuSE 8.2 a try when it became available this month.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Hi like my previous post (several veeks ago) comparing speed from Mandrake 9.1, Redhat 9 & Slackware 9.0.
Redhat's speed is behind Mandrake & Slackware.
This article point the same thing that RedHat9 also slower than Suse 8.2.
So can anyone explain why this is happen?
I hear RH use NPTL that will increase performance why the result is the opposite?
thx.