This is a desktop comparison of Red Hat Linux 9 and SuSE 8.2 Professional Edition. We have used Red Hat Linux 8 for all our work since last fall, and installed version 9 as soon as it became available. However, we have not been fully content with Red Hat, so we gave SuSE 8.2 a try when it became available this month.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
speed is my only issue with redhat. features are there. besides, i try and download all updated software i need from freshrpms.net. plus, in a little while longer, i might just install slackware again, just for the fact that it's faster. i wonder if someone out there could build a "slackware-config" tool that has all the major options (apache, dhcp, samba, etc.) in one easy to use app that can also connect to other slackware computers and configure from one central location. that would be cool. then i'd stick with slackware all the way. no webmin please.
speed is my only issue with redhat. features are there. besides, i try and download all updated software i need from freshrpms.net. plus, in a little while longer, i might just install slackware again, just for the fact that it's faster. i wonder if someone out there could build a "slackware-config" tool that has all the major options (apache, dhcp, samba, etc.) in one easy to use app that can also connect to other slackware computers and configure from one central location. that would be cool. then i'd stick with slackware all the way. no webmin please.