Linked by Adam S on Wed 30th Apr 2003 07:26 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



http://wwws.sun.com/software/sunone/innercircle/newsletter/coursey_...
Just as I don't agree with most of the points raised in the osNews article, I think that David Coursey has got it wrong in the article I reference above.
Unfortunately, they're complimentary. As more and more people have the idea of what would be the Next Great Distro, more of them move full circle towards repeating the history of Unix - binary incompatibility, differing filesystem layouts and increased fragmentation.
If you, YOU the reader, want to see Linux in a dominant position any time soon - or /ever/ - only use distros that don't try and fragment the Linux user base. Support the LSB. /Understand/ why these are good ideas and why they're necessary for Linux to win - and even to survive.