<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/10085/Book_Review_Apple_I_Replica_Creation_Back_to_the_Garage_</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:54:34 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>&amp;quot;buy at amazon&amp;quot;</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>just a question: is that paid advertising or not?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: &amp;quot;buy at amazon&amp;quot;</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>No, it is not a paid advertising. It's just that when a reader actually buys it through that link osnews gets about 1 or 2% of the book's price.<br />
Many people online have such amazon accounts and so when somebody buys it through their link they are able to get a bit of money back to sustain server costs.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Ah those were the days</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;Apple I Replica Creation: Back to the Garage&quot;<br />
<br />
I mis-read that as &quot;Back to the Garbage&quot;.<br />
<br />
When I lived out in South Africa, a friend of mine was a geologist and he insisted on using an Apple//e up until 2002. He just couldn't bring himself to use anything else. Appaently Verbatim still produced 5.1/4 inch disks until just recently, bizarrely.<br />
<br />
Anyway, he got a powerbook.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Love the 6502</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>The 6502 was my favorite processor.  It was simple to program, and oh so much fun.  The only opcode i still remember in hex is LDA #xx(A9 xx)  .  Device drivers were also a breeze to program(since you had to build the hardware <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" />  )<br />
<br />
Ahh, the good old days <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Great!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Seems to be a great and fun book! I will buy this one for sure as soon as possible.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: &amp;quot;buy at amazon&amp;quot;</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Eugenia, this means, you earn money for everyone who buys this book because of your recommendation.<br />
<br />
Don't you really see that this leads to the question wether the review was written a little bit more friendly to the book for that reason?<br />
<br />
Is the money you gain really worth the credibility gap?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Bell &amp;amp; Howell</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I actually used one... back when I was 7 in the 70s.  Apple had Bell &amp; Howell do the manufacturing.  Played Oregon Trail and Colossus cave on that box.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title> RE: &amp;quot;buy at amazon&amp;quot;</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&gt;you earn money for everyone who buys this book<br />
<br />
No I don't. And neither is the author. The OSNews owner does.<br />
(and usually that's not more than 6-7 bucks per such article)<br />
<br />
&gt;wether the review was written a little bit more<br />
&gt; friendly to the book for that reason? <br />
<br />
I can assure it was not. The author is a simple osnews contributor, not an osnews editor, neither an osnews employee. He just wrote his article, and he submitted it to us for publication.<br />
<br />
And besides, look at most book reviews out there. Most sites have such accounts with amazon or BarnesNNobles too. Maybe they don't have the big eye-sore link we do, but their links are also of this nature.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 02:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>LOL :)</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&quot;Device drivers were also a breeze to program(since you had to build the hardware <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" />  ) Ahh, the good old days <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> &quot;<br />
<br />
LOL <img src="/images/emo/grin.gif" alt=";)" />  One of the best jokes I've read in ages</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 07:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>@Diaz Occult </title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>If his old computer does what he needs, why change it?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>As an apple IIe owner...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Love the old days! Nowadays, hardware is just too freaking complex. There's nothing you can do with it, with reasonable tools and eyesight. And now, when they kill off the serial and parallel ports from PCs ('cause they &quot;have to be USB, can not stand vintage&quot;), even doing simple peripherals will be much harder.<br />
<br />
Anyway, I love my Apple IIe, just wish I had a color monitor for it.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>retro HW</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Well I wouldn't want to go so far back as a 6502 anything, but if someone ever does a 68K retro Mac (I have 4 oldies &amp; roms) that would be a neat HW project. Or even the much underrated but slowish 9900, not the TI pc, but the whole world of industrial/embedded stuff it was seriously used for.<br />
<br />
Right now HW design has gotten to be right on the edge of barely being doable by even an advanced hobhyist/EE with todays latest FPGAs having speeds far beyond table top equipment, BGAs having invisible connects, highly stacked boards for signal integrity, too serious.<br />
<br />
I do miss wirewrapping boards just a little and knowing it would just work, today its gotten so abstract.<br />
<br />
Still a small readymade FPGA board (Xess, Digilent etc) with onboard video, PS2, serial, headers, DRAM/SRAM can easily be used to build any retro HW from</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 18:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Agree with poster</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I bought the book yesterday, and my Replica I arrives next month.  I agree with the reviewer -- the author did an excellent job, particularly in the digital logic and assembly language chapters.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 21:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
